Legal Opinion

Gary v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am., Corp.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided April 29, 2019No. 3:17-cv-01414-HZPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:

Plaintiff Alison Gary brings three claims in this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 - 1461 ("ERISA"), alleging that Defendant Unum Life Insurance Company of America wrongfully denied her application for long-term disability ("LTD") benefits under the LTD Plan entered into by Defendant and Plaintiff's former employer. Plaintiff contends that she is entitled to LTD benefits from April 6, 2015, to the date of judgment in this case.

The Court already ruled on the merits of Plaintiff's second claim, as explained below. Now,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. Conkright v. FrommertSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Montour v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Marjorie Booton v. Lockheed Medical Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gary v. Unum Life Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021
  2. Schwarz v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API