Legal Opinion
Ferguson v. SMSC Gaming Enterprise
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 15, 2007No. 06-CV-3743(JMR/FLN)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSENBAUM, District Judge.
Defendants move to dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1). For the following reasons, the motion is granted.
I. Background 1
Plaintiff, an African-American man, worked as a security shift manager at Mystic Lake Casino. Mystic Lake Casino is operated by defendant SMSC Gaming Enterprise (the “Gaming Enterprise”). The Gaming Enterprise is a government branch of the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux (Dakota) Community of Minnesota, a federally recognized Indian tribe. Defendant David Whitley was plaintiffs supervisor.
In May, 2006,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Butler v. Leech Lake Band of OjibweDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
- Spotted Bear v. Poor BearDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2025
- Stathis v. Marty Indian School Board Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2021