Legal Opinion

Makoroff v. Department of Transportation

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

Raising a classic question of contract formation, Stanley G. Makoroff, trustee for Automative Telephone, Inc. (ATI), 1 peti tions for review of an order of the Board of Claims (Board) entering a judgment of “no liability” in favor of the Department of Transportation (PennDOT) under the Commonwealth Procurement Code (Code). 2 ATI seeks lost profits resulting from PennDOT’s alleged breach of contract for the supply of roadside vending services. ATI argues the Board acted arbitrarily and capriciously, abused its discretion, and acted contrary to law. Discerning no merit…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Department of General Services v. Pittsburgh Building Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. City of Scranton v. Heffler, Radetich & Saitta, LLPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Seda-Cog Joint Rail Authority v. Carload Express, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Feldman v. CarboneUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. Pennsylvania Investment Properties, II LP v. Truist BankDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  4. Pennsylvania Investment Properties, II LP v. Truist Bank in Its Own Right and as Successor to Branch Banking and Trust Company (BB&T)District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API