Legal Opinion

Dudas v. Pietrzykowski

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 21, 2004No. 54 MAP 2003PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice NEWMAN.

We granted allocatur in this matter to determine whether the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County (trial court) abused its discretion in ordering that the entire amount paid to Appellant Theodore Pietrzykowski (Husband) as a compromise and release of a workers’ compensation award be placed in an annuity escrow account to satisfy his alimony obligation to Appellee Helen Dudas (Wife). Because the Superior Court improperly affirmed the decision of the trial court, we reverse the Order of the Superior Court and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.

FACTS AND…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wagoner v. WagonerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Bush v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Petto v. PettoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Electric Corp./CBS v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Love v. LoveSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. S.M.C. v. W.P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Abel v. Sciubba, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API