Legal Opinion
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Alter Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 29, 2013No. 12 Civ. 0246(DLC)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
DENISE COTE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”) brings this action to recover royalties it claims are owed pursuant to a patent licensing agreement with defendant Altek Corporation (“Altek”). On February 1, 2013, both parties moved for partial summary judgment on the issue of interpretation of the term “open market price” in the licensing agreement. In addition, Kodak moved for summary judgment on the issue of the validity of the licensing agreement. For the following reasons, the plaintiffs motion is granted and the defendant’s motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
T…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mandarin Trading Ltd. v. WildensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Seiden Associates, Inc. v. Anc Holdings, Inc., American National Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Heublein, Inc. And Subsidiaries v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- LAW DEBENTURE TRUST CO. OF NY. v. Maverick Tube Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Starr Indem. & Liab. Co. v. Brightstar Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Alessi Equipment, Inc. v. American Piledriving Equipment, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Capri Sun GmbH v. American Beverage CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Lombardo v. Camuto Group LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Portal Instruments, Inc. v. LEO Pharma A/SDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.