Legal Opinion

Nauyoks v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Decided May 14, 1941No. Nos. 3504, 3291, 3486, 3297, 3324, 3333, 3509, 3485, 3288, 3295, 3292, 3325, 3296, 3374, 3507, 3505, 3481, 3508, 3378, consolidatedPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Yantis

The above designated claimants have heretofore filed their individual claims in this court, seeking awards for damages alleged to have been suffered by them on the properties described in the respective complaints, by reason of the construction of two underpasses on that part of St. Clair Avenue in East St. Louis, Illinois, which forms a part of U. S. Highway No. 66. The alleged damages claimed in the foregoing cases total $382,565.26.

As the several causes of action all arise out of the same construction work, and as the same legal questions are primarily involved, counsel for the several…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited32 opinions

Rigney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
City of Chicago v. Union Building Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
Pause v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
City of Winchester v. RingIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad v. BlackerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Goodman's Peppermill Restaurant v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1999