Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Langford

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1916No. 13031PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Kennan, J., entered March 6, 1915, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in replevin, after a trial to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

In an action in replevin tried to the court without a jury, findings were made and a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiffs. The defendant Langford has appealed.

It appears that the respondents, on December 27, 1913, sold a mangle to T. Hondi upon a conditional sale contract. A day or two afterwards, the principal parts of the mangle were delivered to Mr. Hondi. While installing the mangle, it was discovered that certain parts, consisting of a shaft and certain rollers, were missing. Thereafter the respondents supplied the missing parts. On January 9, 1914, the respondents filed the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mentzer v. Commercial Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Grunbaum Bros. Furniture Co. v. Humphrey Investment Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Malott v. General MacHinery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Monotype Co. v. GuieWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Grunbaum Brothers Furniture Co. v. Humphrey Investment Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API