Legal Opinion
Parrish v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 23, 1995No. A94A2438PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Birdsong, Presiding Judge.
James W. Parrish III appeals his conviction for driving under the influence and driving with unlawful blood alcohol concentration. Held:
1. The implied consent warning given to appellant is found to have been inaccurate according to the decision of this court in State v. Causey, 215 Ga. App. 85 (449 SE2d 639) (cert. denied), and the State’s blood alcohol test, as ruled in Causey, was inadmissible. The conviction for driving with unlawful blood alcohol concentration under OCGA § 40-6-391 is reversed.
2. The conviction for driving while “under the influence of alcohol to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Lattarulo v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Kirkland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- State v. CauseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hawkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Hamilton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Richards v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Wesley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.