Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Richman v. Richman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 5, 1941PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Advisory Master Herr in the Court of Chancery.

For affirmance — Dofges, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Hague, JJ. 7.

For reversal — The Chiee-Justioe, Parker, Case, Bodine, I-Ieher, Raeeerty, JJ. 6.

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Flicker v. ChenitzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  2. Wolff v. WolffNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  3. Caravella v. CaravellaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  4. Falzo v. FalzoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  5. Munger v. MungerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API