Legal Opinion

Richter v. McNamara's Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1908No. Docket No. 51Published

Error to .Kent; Perkins, J. Henry J. Richter presented a claim for expenses incurred as executor of the last will and testament of Mary McNamara, deceased. The claim was allowed in the probate court, and James McNamara appealed to the circuit court. There was judgment sustaining the order of the probate court, and contestant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

This case comes to this court upon writ of error to review the judgment of the circuit court for the county of Kent, allowing the account of Bishop Richter, as executor of the last will and testament of Mary McNamara, deceased, as theretofore allowed by the probate court of said county. The will was admitted to probate in the probate court, but was disallowed in the circuit court, in consequence of the verdict of the jury that it was obtained by undue influence. Pending the appeal to the circuit court, a special administrator was appointed, in accordance with the provisions of section 678, 1…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Churchill v. MaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API