Legal Opinion

Baroch v. Greater Montana Oil Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1924No. 5,378PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Galen

The parties plaintiff and defendant at the trial and in this court have treated this as an action to recover on a promissory note and accordingly it will be so considered by us. All are joined in the one action alleged in one count. The only allegation as to the liability of individual defendants, including the plaintiff, appears on the back of the note under the legend: “Payment guaranteed,” followed by the signatures of such defendants and also plaintiff’s own signature. No question was raised by demurrer or otherwise as to the sufficiency of the complaint so that we shall raise none. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Belleville Savings Bank v. BornmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Merchants' Exchange Bank v. LuckowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. Square Butte State Bank v. BallardMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Jenkins v. First Nat'l Bk. of Balto.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1919
  5. Robertson v. Virginia National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Weinberg v. Farmers State Bank of WordenMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Anderson v. BorderMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Olsen v. ZapponeMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  4. H. Phillips Co. v. Estate of PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Weinberg v. Farmers State Bank of WordenMontana Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API