Legal Opinion
Colorado v. Cavazos
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 17, 1992No. 90-1298PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALDON J. ANDERSON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants seek this court’s determination that the district court erred in granting defendants-appellees motion for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint. The issue presented is whether the 1987 amendments to provisions of the Higher Education Act of 1965 governing the Guaranteed Student Loan Program (“GSLP”)1 resulted in a governmental taking of private property without fair compensation and were therefore unconstitutional.
Plaintiffs-Appellants are four state agencies and one state-chartered nonprofit corporation. All of the five…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rhode Island Higher Education Assistance Authority v. Secretary, U.S. Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Margaret Slade, for the Estate of Lawrence Slade, Deceased v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Education Assistance Corporation, a South Dakota Corporation v. Lauro F. Cavazos, Secretary of Education of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Ohio Student Loan Commission v. Lauro F. Cavazos, Secretary of the United States Department of Education and United States Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Student Loan Fund of Idaho, Inc. v. U.S. Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- McNamee, Lochner, Titus & Williams, P.C. v. Higher Education Assistance FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Student Loan Fund Of Idaho, Inc. v. U.S. Department Of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Mcnamee v. Higher Education Assistance FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- State of Colorado v. CavazosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992