Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dixon v. 105 West 75th Street LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 30, 2017No. 159846/14 2764 2763Published

1DissentGesmer, J.

I agree with the majority’s finding that the landlord defendants (landlord) are not entitled to legal fees and costs, and join in that portion of the memorandum. However, because I do not *631agree that the landlord submitted sufficient documentation in admissible form (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]; Advanced Global Tech., LLC v Sirius Satellite Radio, Inc., 44 AD3d 317, 318 [1st Dept 2007]) to “utterly refute [ ]” plaintiff’s claims and establish a defense as a matter of law (Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326 [2002]), I respectfully dissent from the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Goshen v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. West Village Associates v. Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Advanced Global Technology, LLC v. Sirius Satellite Radio, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. 300 West 49th Street Associates v. New York State Division of HousingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API