Dixon v. 105 West 75th Street LLC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentGesmer, J.
I agree with the majority’s finding that the landlord defendants (landlord) are not entitled to legal fees and costs, and join in that portion of the memorandum. However, because I do not *631agree that the landlord submitted sufficient documentation in admissible form (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]; Advanced Global Tech., LLC v Sirius Satellite Radio, Inc., 44 AD3d 317, 318 [1st Dept 2007]) to “utterly refute [ ]” plaintiff’s claims and establish a defense as a matter of law (Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326 [2002]), I respectfully dissent from the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Goshen v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- West Village Associates v. Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Advanced Global Technology, LLC v. Sirius Satellite Radio, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- 300 West 49th Street Associates v. New York State Division of HousingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.