Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Tennessee v. Herrington

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 25, 1986No. Nos. 85-3859, 86-5087 and 86-5168Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWellford, Circuit Judge

I concur in Judge Kennedy’s analysis concerning jurisdiction; this court has orig*654inal jurisdiction over actions concerning the issues here presented. See General Elec. Uranium Management Corp. v. United States Dep’t of Energy, 764 F.2d 896, 904 (D.C.Cir.1985). Her statement of the background of the cases is a correct recitation; therefore, I have no problem with parts I and II of the decision and join in this discussion and disposition.

The Act’s consultation and cooperation requirements1 present a confused and complicated set of problems. As pointed out in footnote 9 of Judge Kennedy’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State of Tenn. v. HerringtonDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API