Legal Opinion
Duckworth v. Cameron
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided May 3, 1978No. 20675PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rhodes, Justice:
The only question presented on this appeal is whether a licensed residential home builder is precluded from enforcing a contract entered into in violation of the Residential Home Builders Act.1
The facts are undisputed. The appellant, a residential home builder, and the respondents entered into a contract for the construction of a house. At the time, the. appellant was not licensed by the South Carolina Residential Home Builders Commission as required by S. C. Code § 40-59-70 (1976) and was in violation of the Residential Home Builders Act.
Just prior to the completion of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Henderson v. EvansSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Martin v. EllisorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
3Cited by8 opinions
- C-Sculptures, LLC v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Columbia Pools, Inc. v. MoonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Wagner v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
- Lenz v. Walsh ex rel. James L. Walsh Revocable TrustCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Burry & Son Homebuilders, Inc. v. FordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.