Legal Opinion

Gallagher v. Merry

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 2, 1951No. Appeal, 269PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,

The appeal is from a decree in equity sustaining preliminary objections to plaintiff’s amended bill of complaint, and the entry of a final decree in favor of defendants.

James Gallagher, the plaintiff, in a crudely drawn amended bill in equity, avers that he was the sole and absolute owner of all the capital stock of two named corporations and that his son-in-law, Walter J. Merry, occupying a confidential relation, fraudulently induced him to transfer all of bis stock holdings to his son-in-law, a daughter and granddaughter (wife and child of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Custis v. SerrillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mistick v. CammackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Ermel v. ErmelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Williams v. ROSESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Ciletti v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Wood v. Collingdale BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API