Legal Opinion

Citizens' Savings Bank of San Diego v. MacK

California Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1919No. L. A. No. 4734PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.

The plaintiff by this action sought to restrain by injunction the defendant Bentley Ostrich Farm from canceling certain certificates of its corporate capital stock standing on its books in the name of the defendant Henry Eummelen, and to prohibit the corporation defendant from issuing to the defendant Mack other certificates in lieu thereof evidencing in the aggregate 280 shares of the corporate stock, and also to restrain the defendant Mack from receiving under claim of ownership or otherwise all or any portion of the said stock. The appeal, presented on the judgment-roll alone, is only from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. TolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Brittan v. Oakland Bank of SavingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Kent v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Mack v. EummelenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  5. Preble v. CongerIllinois Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shedoudy v. Beverly Surgical Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Willard v. National Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API