Legal Opinion

Profit v. City of Tulsa

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 25, 1978No. M-77-487Published

1Opinion of the Court

574 P.2d 1053 (1978)

Patricia Ann PROFIT, Appellant,

v.

The CITY OF TULSA, Appellee.

No. M-77-487.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

January 25, 1978.

Ronald H. Mook, Thomas E. Salisbury, Legal Intern, Tulsa, for appellant.

Waldo F. Bales, City Atty., Edward J. Hicks, Asst. City Atty., Tulsa, for appellee.

OPINION

BUSSEY, Presiding Judge:

The appellant, Patricia Ann Profit, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged in the Municipal Court of the City of Tulsa with the offense of Soliciting Another To Commit an Act of Lewdness or Prostitution, in violation of Tulsa, Okl., Rev. Ordinances,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. LawrenceCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Warner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971
  4. Synnott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
  5. Groom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API