Dahl v. Mandrusiak

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 BRIDGETT DAHL, Case No.: 2:18-cv-02225-APG-DJA 4 Plaintiff Order Regarding Motions in Limine 5 v. [ECF Nos. 80, 81, 82, 97] 6 JACOB MANDRUSIAK, 7 Defendant 8 The parties have filed four motions in limine to exclude evidence at trial. I resolve them 9 below. 10 Defendant’s Motion in Limine #1 (ECF No. 80) 11 Defendant Jacob Mandrusiak seeks to exclude evidence that he consumed alcohol on the 12 day in question. ECF No. 80. He argues that such evidence is admissible only if there is also 13 evidence of impairment, which there is none.…