Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 4, 1914No. A-2009PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from County Court, Choctazv County; W. T. Glenn, Judge. Charles Blankenship was convicted of a violation of the prohibitory law, and appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, J.

Plaintiff in error was in the court below convicted of the offense of unlawfully conveying intoxicating liquor. The jury assessed his punishment at a fine of $100 and 60 days’ Imprisonment in the county jail. The judgment and sentence was rendered on the 10th day of May, 1913.

Error is assigned on an exception to the refusal of the court for a full jury panel of twelve jurors from which to select a jury of six to try the case.

Counsel cite section 3696, Rev. Laws 1910, in support of their contention. This provides for a special jury panel in the county court after the regular panel has been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Maynes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Rupard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Littrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. State v. HurstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  3. Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Stewart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API