Legal Opinion

McDonald v. McDonald

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 3, 1958No. 15936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RENFRO, Justice.

Idella McDonald sued Johnnie for divorce and property division. Johnnie filed cross-action for divorce. Johnnie was granted a divorce on his cross-action. Idella appealed.

The first question presented is whether the evidence was sufficient to support the judgment for divorce on Johnnie’s cross-action.

His complete testimony, in so far as it relates to grounds for divorce, was as follows: Johnnie’s age was “up in the 70’s”; he and Idella were married in 1936; he “really loved that woman”; they got along fine, but had some little disputes about different things. In answer to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ingham v. InghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. Lohmuller v. LohmullerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Blake v. BlakeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Hogue v. HogueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Yosko v. YoskoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cusack v. CusackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Barrett v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  3. Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Brown v. Brown, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1986
  5. Hodges v. PembertonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API