McDonald v. McDonald
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
RENFRO, Justice.
Idella McDonald sued Johnnie for divorce and property division. Johnnie filed cross-action for divorce. Johnnie was granted a divorce on his cross-action. Idella appealed.
The first question presented is whether the evidence was sufficient to support the judgment for divorce on Johnnie’s cross-action.
His complete testimony, in so far as it relates to grounds for divorce, was as follows: Johnnie’s age was “up in the 70’s”; he and Idella were married in 1936; he “really loved that woman”; they got along fine, but had some little disputes about different things. In answer to the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ingham v. InghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Lohmuller v. LohmullerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Blake v. BlakeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Hogue v. HogueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Yosko v. YoskoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cusack v. CusackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Barrett v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Brown v. Brown, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1986
- Hodges v. PembertonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.