Legal Opinion
Wallshein v. SHUGARMAN
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 15, 2010No. 4D10-211PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGross, C.J.
We affirm the circuit court’s order compelling arbitration.
Dr. Richard Shugarman went to work for the Palm Beach Eye Center in 2005. The two parties entered into a Professional Employment Agreement. The Agreement contains an arbitration clause, which stated in pertinent part:
16. ARBITRATION. All controversies arising out of or connected with this Professional Employment Agreement, including any of its terms or conditions, the transactions contemplated hereby, or the alleged breach or enforceability of any of its terms or conditions, and including any controversy as to whether or not such…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Seifert v. US Home Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Powertel, Inc. v. BexleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Gendzier v. BieleckiSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. MelamedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Affinity Internet v. CONSOLIDATED CREDITDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Spring Lake NC, LLC v. FigueroaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- CT Miami, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Latinoamerica Miami, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Pratt v. WeissDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- American Management Services, Inc., and Brandy Fedorak v. Juanita MercedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016