Legal Opinion

Tufts v. Little

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 15, 1876PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Injunction. Receiver. Vendor and purchaser. Before Judge Bartlett. Jones county. At Chambers. January 22, 1876. Reported in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Jackson, Judge.

The intestate of Little sold certain lands to Tufts, and put him in possession, and gave him bond for titles thereto. He paid nothing therefor, either of principal or interest, but had been in possession four years, using the rents, issues and profits of the lands; had become insolvent and gone into bankruptcy on his own petition, and was totally unable to respond for damages or rent in ejectment, or to pay the money due on a suit for the purchase money; he had alleged falsely and fraudulently to the bankrupt court that the title was in him, and had a homestead assigned him…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bank of Ogdensburgh v. ArnoldNew York Court of Chancery · 1835

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cooley v. MossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Hunter v. BowenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  3. Tumlin v. VanhornSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  4. Vizard v. MoodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Wheeler v. Layman FoundationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API