Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Grinnell v. Weston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1904Published

Appeal by the defendant, Edward Weston, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York-on the 27th day of January, 1904, upon the verdict of a jury for $12,500, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 22d day of December, '1903, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1ConcurrenceLaughlin, J.

I do not agree with the rule governing the award of exemplary damages as laid down in the prevailing opinion, yet I think' a new trial should be granted upon the ground that the verdict is excessive and that the jury were not fully instructed with reference to their *467duties in determining the amount of the award of vindictive damages. I understand that to warrant the award of exemplary-damages which, as the term implies, are intended not as a compensation to the plaintiff but as a punishment to the defendant and a warning to him and others against the repetition of such conduct in the future,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Warner v. Press Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Smith v. . MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Young v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  4. Grant v. Herald Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API