Legal Opinion
H. Hackfeld & Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 2, 1905No. 1,004PublishedCited by 3 opinions
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Hawaii.
1Opinion of the Court
HAWLEY, District Judge.
The writ of error in this case is taken from judgments of convictions in 12 separate criminal informations, filed by the United States district attorney in the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, which were all consolidated for the purpose of trial.
Each information contained two counts—the first alleging, in proper form, that on the 21st day of December, 1902, the defendant (plaintiff in error in this court), as agent of the steamship Coptic, did negligently permit to be landed a certain named alien Japanese immigrant, contrary to the provisions of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- H. Hackfeld & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Warren v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1893
3Cited by3 opinions
- Daniels v. Eagle Family Foods Group LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Festa v. NDOCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022
- Jones v. CarrabyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019