Legal Opinion · Dissent

Harrison Ex Rel. Harrison v. Board of Regents

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 2013No. 34,349;Docket 32,215Published

1DissentGarcia, Judge

{30} I respectfully dissent in this case and view the issue very narrowly. Regents do not contest the position that the district court can properly impose compensatory sanctions against a governmental entity as part of its inherent authority. Nor do they appeal the award of the compensatory sanction imposed by the district court. Instead, Regents ask this Court to determine as a matter of first impression whether the district court has the right to exercise its inherent legal authority to impose a purely punitive sanction against a governmental entity for improper conduct during a legal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Holland v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  2. United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  3. First National Bank Ex Rel. Huckleby v. Nor-Am Agricultural Products, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. State Ex Rel. Schwartz v. KennedyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State Ex Rel. Bardacke v. WelshNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API