Legal Opinion
Goldston v. Bandwidth Technology Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 21, 2006Published
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Rolando T. Acosta, J.), entered October 7, 2005, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment dismissing defendants’ *748second and sixth affirmative defenses, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Among the numerous issues of fact precluding summary judgment are whether the contract was a “general retainer” (Atkins & O’Brien v ISS Intl. Serv. Sys., 252 AD2d 446, 448 [1998]; cf. Matter of Cooperman, 83 NY2d 465, 476 [1994]) and thus exempt from the rule limiting attorneys to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of CoopermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Greenberg v. Jerome H. Remick & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Bahar v. SchwartzreichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Palmerton v. Envirogas, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Atkins & O'Brien L. L. P. v. ISS International Service System, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.