Legal Opinion

Hinshaw v. New England Mut. Life Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 31, 1939No. 11392, 11393PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Circuit Judge.

So far as the issues presented in these two appeals are concerned, they in effect arise from two actions at law brought by appellant’s predecessor to recover the sums paid by way of single premiums for two annuity contracts, one issued by the ap-pellee New England Mutual Life Insurance Company, and the other by the appellee Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company. The suits were initiated by appel-lees, each having filed suit for a declaratory judgment against appellant. It will be convenient to refer to the parties as they appeared below.

To the petitions filed by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Mammoth Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  2. Boatmen's Nat. Co. v. M. W. Elkins & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  3. Troll v. SpencerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  4. Roosevelt v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  5. Moss v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Morris v. Pennsylvania R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  2. ætna Ins. Co. v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  3. Southern Agency Co. v. LaSalle Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  4. Golden West Construction Co. v. United States ex rel. BernadotCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  5. Golden West Construction Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API