State v. Highsmith
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
Defendant assigns as error the denial of his motion for a continuance, the exclusion of prior testimony from the probable cause hearing, and his sentencing. For the reasons which follow, we find no error in defendant’s trial and sentencing.
Defendant first assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to continue in order to obtain witnesses on his behalf. Defendant does not contend the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for continuance; rather, he asserts as error the denial of his constitutional rights, arguing the testimony of the absent…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. BrowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Johnson v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. CantySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. DeeseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- State v. JerniganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- State v. LyleNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.