Brett v. Clark
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Olay District Oowrt.— IIoN. W. B. Q.uaetoN, Judge. This is an appeal from an order made on defendants’ motion to retax the costs in certain proceedings to the plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtDeeaiee, J.
Five separate actions were commenced in the district court of Clay, county by plaintiff, E. 0. Bowell, and one C. J. Barringér, as follows: 0. J. Barringer* v. Elizabeth Daniels et al., and 0/ J. Barringer v. William Brett et ah, involving in all two hundred and eighty-one acres of land; E. C. Eowell v. John 0. Clark et ah, and E. C. Eowell v. Sophia Weinman et ah, involving two hundred and four acres of land; and William Brett, plaintiff herein, v. John C. Clark et al., involving seventy acres *545of land. Tbe actions were to locate and establish corners and boundaries, and to recover possession…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rowell v. WeinemannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Rowell v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
3Cited by4 opinions
- McGovern v. HeerySupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Wenstrand v. KiddooSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
- Hart v. DelpheySupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Springer v. Metropolitan Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933