Legal Opinion

(SS) Hay v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 25, 2021No. 2:18-cv-01706Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ZAK FRANKLIN HAY, No. 2:18-cv-1706-EFB 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER 13 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 Plaintiff moves for an award of attorney’s fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice 18 Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1). ECF Nos. 25, 26. He seeks fees in the amount of 19 $18,866.75 for time spent by attorney Robert Weems and paralegal Andrew Ragnes litigating this 20 action (including the instant motion for fees) and associated expenses (such as court…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API