Legal Opinion

Bowe v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 24, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

FUENTES, J.A.D.

In this appeal we are asked to decide whether a plaintiff seeking Personal Injury Protection (PIP) benefits under N.J.S.A 39:6A-4 must prove that the treatment she received was causally related to a particular automobile accident when the insurer asserts a pre-existing injury or condition as a defense. We hold that a plaintiff seeking PIP benefits must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the treatment for which she seeks reimbursement was proximately caused by the particular automobile accident triggering coverage under her…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nieder v. Royal Indemnity InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  2. Cruz-Mendez v. ISU/Insurance ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  3. Lindstrom v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  4. Brady v. Department of PersonnelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  5. Polk v. DaconceicaoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bardis v. First Trenton InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  2. Lopez v. PatelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  3. Bardis v. First Trenton InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API