Legal Opinion · Dissent

Video Aid Corp. v. Town of Wallkill

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 1995Published

1DissentBellacosa, J.

Concededly and no longer at issue in this case, the $27,000 water sewer tap-in fee paid by Video Aid Corp. to the appellant Town to secure a building permit was unconstitutional, as declared by Supreme Court. The sole issue that divides this Court is whether the Appellate Division order directing the Town to make reimbursement is erroneous. We think it is not.

The Appellate Division applied this Court’s calibrated, fact-specific analysis (see, City of Rochester v Chiarella, 58 NY2d 316, 323-324), and concluded, in affirming Supreme Court, that the payment was made under legal duress (203 AD2d…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Paramount Film Distributing Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Mercury Machine Importing Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. City of Rochester v. ChiarellaNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. City of New York v. 17 Vista AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Buckley v. Mayor of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API