Legal Opinion

Norstrom v. Wahl

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 18, 1930No. 4218PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from a decree restraining appellant from further infringing appellee’s patent No. 1,487,189 on a hair clipper.

The patent covers an electrically driven hair clipper such as is commonly used in barber shops. Its validity has heretofore been sustained by this court and, on several occasions, by District Courts. See (D. C.) 19 F.(2d) 544; (C. C. A.) 27 F.(2d) 635, 636; (C. C. A.) 27 F.(2d) 637.

Noninfringement is the sole defense, and necessarily so because appellant was the president of the company that unsuccessfully contested the validity and scope of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. N. E. Norstrom Electric Mfg. Co. v. WahlCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
  2. Norstrom v. WahlCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
  3. Wahl v. N. E. Norstrom Electric Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown & Sharpe Co. v. WahlCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
  2. Wahl v. Brown & Sharpe Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API