Legal Opinion
M.S. v. DOWNINGTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 28, 2022No. 2:20-cv-05085Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA M.S. A MINOR, by and through her : parents, Emily S. and Drew S., : : 20-cv-5085-JMY vs. : : DOWNINGTOWN AREA SCHOOL : DISTRICT. : MEMORANDUM Younge, J. October 28, 2022 This action was filed under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (hereinafter “IDEA”). Plaintiffs alleged that Downingtown Area School District (hereinafter “District”) violated M.S.’s right to a free appropriate public education (hereinafter “FAPE”). Plaintiffs seek tuition reimbursement to private education at public expense. M.S.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Florence County School District Four v. Carter Ex Rel. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Schaffer Ex Rel. Schaffer v. WeastSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Ridgewood Board of Education v. N.E., as Guardian Ad Litem for M.E., an Infant Mary E., Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for M.E., an Infant, Defendants/third-Party v. Frederick Stokley, Superintendent John Campion, Director of Special Programs Charles Abate, Principal William Ward, Principal Lorraine Zak, Psychologist Kathleen McNally Social Worker Caroline Janover, Ldt-C George Neville, Principal Henry Hogue, Psychologist June Ann Dibb, Dr., Psychiatrist Joan Christian, Ldt-C Susan Lynaugh, Psychologist, Third-Party N.E., as Guardian Ad Litem for M.E., an Infant Mary E., Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for M.E., an InfantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.