Legal Opinion

Carl v. Chilcote

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1987No. 86-475PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber

The plaintiffs filed this action for losses suffered as the result of breach of a real estate construction contract. The District Court for the Fourth Judicial District, Missoula County, granted the summary judgment motion of defendant Security Abstract Company. Plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.

The issue is whether the District Court erred in granting summary judgment for Security Abstract Company.

This case arises out of the same facts and disputes involved in a case previously before this Court, Walters v. Campeau (Mont.1983), 205 Mont. 448, 668 P.2d 1054, 40 St.Rep. 1419. Plaintiffs Carl…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pretty on Top v. City of HardinMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Morales v. TuomiMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Walters v. CampeauMontana Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carl v. ChilcoteMontana Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API