Legal Opinion

Irwin v. Keller

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 13, 1965No. 20,089Published

1Opinion of the CourtFaulconer, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for damages awarded plaintlffs-appellees for breach of contract. Trial was by the court without the intervention of a jury. Appellant assigns as error the overruling of his motion for new trial, and. the overruling of his motion to modify judgment.

The only ground of appellant’s motion for new trial asserted in the argument section of appellant’s brief is specification No. 6, i.e., “The finding of the Court is not sustained by sufficient evidence and is contrary to law.”

While this court prefers to decide appeals on their merits, appellant must first comply…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Gilmore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Ecker v. FuchsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Chadwick v. BaughmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. Israel v. Logansport Aerie No. 323Indiana Court of Appeals · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API