Legal Opinion · Dissent

Acord v. Pettit

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 14, 2013No. 30323-3-IIIPublished

1Dissent

Siddoway, A.C.J.

¶43 (dissenting) — The outcome of this trial turned substantially on the trial court’s decision to admit the testimony of Fred Chandler, given in a different case tried 15 years before this one and over 4 years before Britton and Lynnette Pettit acquired their property. I agree with the majority that the trial court acted within its discretion in concluding that the defendants in that case— Carl and Donna Thomsen — had an opportunity and similar motive to cross-examine Mr. Chandler concerning the location, use, and time of construction of what he contended was a boundary fence…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Richards v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. American National Fire Insurance Co. v. B & L Trucking and Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. American National Fire Insurance v. B&L Trucking & Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API