Legal Opinion

Borough of Ingram v. Sinicrope

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 1973No. Appeal, No. 680 C.D. 1972PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Wilkinson,

Appellees were denied a permit to operate a beauty and gift boutique in a single family dwelling located at 207 Maxwell Street, Borough of Ingram. Appellees then requested a variance from the zoning ordinance which designated the property in question as an “A Residential District,” and when the variance was denied by the Zoning Hearing Board, appealed to the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County. The court, after hearing additional testimony, reversed the Zoning Hearing Board and granted the variance.

Where the lower court has considered additional evidence in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ferry v. KownackiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Gro AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Peirce v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Philadelphia v. Earl Scheib Realty Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Crafton Borough AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Harper v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Boulevard Land Corp. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. In re Appeal of deBottonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. J. Richard Fretz, Inc. v. Hilltown Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Board of Commissioners v. Decision & Action of the Zoning BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API