Legal Opinion

Sanchez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 7, 1997No. Nos. 95-2038, 95-2336PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We find, as the State properly concedes, that the trial court erred by sentencing the defendant, Guillermo Sanchez, to a three-year minimum mandatory term for the use of a firearm to run consecutively to the minimum mandatory terms imposed pursuant to the habitual violent offender statute. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resen-tencing consistent with Jackson v. State, 659 So.2d 1060 (Fla.1995).

The defendant’s remaining points lack merit.

Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part, and remanded for resentencing.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tunsil v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. Sanchez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003