Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Michigan Land & Iron Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1883PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Marquette. (G-rant, J.) Ejectment. Plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This is an action of ejectment, claiming in the declaration the northwest quarter of section 25, town 48 north of range 31 west, except a strip 80 rods by 14 in the northeast corner. All parties claim through the Marquette, Houghton & Ontonagon Railroad Company, the original grantee from the government. The plaintiffs are grantees subject to certain reservations of minerals, etc., and rights connected with their working and removal, and defendants among them own such rights as were reserved, — the Land & Iron Company as proprietors and the other defendants as licensees and lessees. The main…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Drummond v. White Oak Fuel Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Piedmont & George's Creek Coal Co. v. KearneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  3. Marquette Cement Mining Co. v. Oglesby Coal Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1918
  4. Keweenaw Ass'n v. FriedrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Howell v. Cuyuna Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API