Pugh v. Richmond
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the CourtPuryear, J.
For the sake of convenience in this complex case we will refer to the parties as they appeared in the Court below, wherein James Richmond, Jr., Douglas Gilmore, Van Gilmore, 8. Rondall Page, Carolyn R. Page, James B. Turner, Trustee, and Provident Trust Company, were complainants and A. E. Pugh, Dennis Wright, C. 0. Ingram, Trustee, James D. Jones and Doris Jones Realty Company were defendants.
We find an accurate statement of the ease contained in the Chancellor’s memorandum opinion and also in the defendants’ brief and we will closely follow these statements in briefly reciting the facts of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Anderson v. MillerTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
- Mitchell v. SherrellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929
3Cited by4 opinions
- Holt v. Citizens Central BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- Ferrell v. Southern Financial, Inc. (In Re Ferrell)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1994
- Watson v. United American Bank in KnoxvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
- Holt v. Citizens Central BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1984