Lunsford v. Mills
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Newby
The purpose of underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in our state is to serve as a safeguard when tortfeasors’ liability policies do not provide sufficient recovery — that is, when the tortfeasors are “under insured.” This is simply not the case here. Plaintiff incurred damages amounting to $900,000. He brought suit jointly and severally against responsible tortfeasors whose total liability limits were $1,050,000. Those combined liability limits were more than sufficient to satisfy plaintiff’s damages and were more than twice as high as plaintiff’s $400,000 UIM limits. Not only does the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gray v. North Carolina Insurance UnderwritingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. PenningtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Electric Supply Co. of Durham, Inc. v. Swain Electrical Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ChantosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.