Carter v. 1st Nat'l Bk. Pocahontas
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Three appeals in one record from Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City. (Hbuisler, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. The causes were argued together before Boyd, C. J., Briscoe, Burke, Thomas, Pattison, Hrner, Stockbridge and Constable, JJ.
1Opinion of the CourtStockbridge, J.
The record in this case though voluminous, presents but two questions: one of equity pleading, and the other the sufficiency in law of the amended bill of complaint to require the defendants to answer. The original bill was filed by two holders of bonds of the Big Vein Pocahontas Company against the individual members of a bondholders? committee of the company and who were also to act as a reorganization committee of the company, the reorganized corporation and certain trust companies. The substance of the allegations are that Thomas T. Boswell having acquired by lease on March 12th, 1909,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Booth v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
- Industrial General Trust, Ltd. v. . TodNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Cox v. . StokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- United Water Works Co. v. . Omaha Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Peoria & E. Ry. Co. v. CosterU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1899
3Cited by10 opinions
- Woods v. City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Kaliopulus v. LummCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
- Conroy v. Southern Maryland Agricultural Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
- Central Sav. Bank of Balto. v. PostCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
- Snyder v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.