Sabin Community Development Corp. v. Employment Department

The majority affirms the EAB because it concludes that substantial evidence supports the EAB’s conclusion that claimant had good cause to leave work. ORS 657.176(2)(c); OAR 471-30-038(4). I dissent because, on examination, the EAB’s order is unsupported by substantial evidence and fails to explain how its findings support its conclusion. Accordingly, I would remand for reconsideration.

The EAB made the following pertinent findings of fact:

“(6) Claimant worked for Sabin Community Development Corp. as a project manager, from late October, 1993, to July 8, 1994. (7) She quit, in part because she…