Legal Opinion

State v. Salz

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 28, 1992No. 9553PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-56 (a) (l).1 The defendant claims (1) that the trial court incorrectly instructed the jury as to the meaning of recklessness, the mental state necessary for a conviction under § 53a-56 (a) (1), and (2) that there was not sufficient evidence of the defendant’s awareness of and conscious disregard of a substantial and unjustifiable risk that death would result from his conduct to support his conviction. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Th…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. State v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. State v. BunkleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. SalzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. In re Adalberto S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  3. State v. GoodrumConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  4. State v. BunkerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  5. State v. GlennConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API