Legal Opinion

Ceasar v. City of Tulsa

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 7, 1993No. 79931PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSEN, Chief Judge:

Plaintiff, Sherman Ceasar, filed an action against the City of Tulsa, (City), under the Governmental Tort Claims Act, 51 O.S. 1991 § 151 et seq. He presented his claim to City within one year from the date the alleged tort was committed as required by § 156(B) of the Act. On September 27, 1991, in an apparent over abundance of caution to avoid the running of the statute of limitations for tort actions found at 12 O.S. 1991 § 95(4), Ceasar filed an action against City prior to City’s denial of his claim. He did not attempt service at this time. However, under §…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of SpeakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Lasiter v. City of MooreCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
  3. Perkins v. MasekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. State ex rel. Simms v. SimmonsCourt on the Judiciary of Oklahoma · 1985

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Green v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Duncan v. City of Nichols HillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Randolph v. Oklahoma Military Department Ex Rel. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Gibson v. City of TulsaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. Hathaway v. MEDICAL RESEARCH & TECH. AUTH.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API