Legal Opinion

Bryant v. . Peebles

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1885PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Civil actioN, tried at the Spring Term, 1884, of the Superior Court of NORTHAMPTON county, before Avery, Judge. Judgment for defendant. Appeal by plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The feme plaintiff, as sole heir-at-law of William Griffith, claims the money, sought to be recovered in this action and produced by a sale of the intestate’s land, which was made by the present defendant, then clerk and master under a decree of the court of equity of Northampton.

The purchaser, Matthew Bryant, executed his note therefor under seal and with sureties payable at twelve mouths.

Before the expiration of the credit, the defendant retired from office and delivered the security to his successor, Geo. B. Barnes, who, after maturity, put it in suit and recovered judgment. Execution was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Robertson v. . DunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  2. Humble v. . MebaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  3. Patterson v. . LillySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  4. Wall v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  5. Sain v. . BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Furman v. . TimberlakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. Moore v. . GarnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. White v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1838
  4. State v. . BattleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API