Legal Opinion

Christopher v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 13, 1988No. 75270PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Banke, Presiding Judge.

The appellants are defendants in two separate condemnation actions filed by the state, seeking forfeiture of certain money, firearms, jewelry, and other items previously seized by the state pursuant to the forfeiture provisions of the Controlled Substances Act. See OCGA § 16-13-49. We granted their application for interlocutory appeal of an order entered by the trial court suspending discovery in the two actions, pending the disposition of related criminal indictments against two of the appellants.

The salient facts are not in dispute. After the condemnation petitions…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Lang v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Young v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  5. State of Ga. v. Britt Caribe Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. CALDWELL Et Al. v. CHURCHCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  2. Womack v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  3. Chumley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API