Legal Opinion
Fisher v. GEICO General Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 25, 2005No. 04 CIV. 1895(WCC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Allen Fisher brings this action against defendants GEICO General Insurance Company (“GEICO” or “defendant”) and Betty F. Schultz (collectively, the “defendants”) seeking a declaratory judgment ruling that GEICO is required to provide coverage to Schultz for an automobile accident in which Fisher was injured. The principal inquiry before this Court is whether the vehicle Schultz was driving at the time of the accident was furnished for her regular use. If it was, plaintiffs claim is not covered by Schultz’s GEICO policy…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Allstate Insurance v. NoorhassanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance v. JenningsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Mundell v. Nationwide InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1999
3Cited by3 opinions
- Al Infinity LLC v. Crown Cell Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Kendall Central School District v. Century Indemnity Company, as successor to CCI Insurance Company, as successor to Insurance Company of North AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2026
- Welliver McGuire, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019